30th November 2014 | Dave Bookless | 2 comments

Mary – Teenage revolutionary

As Christmas approaches, we move to the New Testament, and to Mary, who carried the infant Jesus for nine long months. Mary often gets hidden beneath layers of tradition, whether in the Nativity play, dressed in blue and sitting on a donkey, or as the Madonna with sacred heart and crown of stars. To get to the heart of who Mary really was, let’s look at her longest speech – the Magnificat – Mary’s song when meeting her cousin Elizabeth, in Luke 1:46-55.

Taken at the March for Alternative on Saturday 26 March 2011, by Garry Knight

The Magnificat is often associated with beautiful, traditional music, but this can conceal the passionate words of a young teenager who is full of radical hopes for a new world order. Mary begins by rejoicing at God’s choice of a humble village girl for his great work, and then delivers a stirring praise-song about a God who turns the world upside down. In his mercy, God will overthrow proud rulers, reject the wealthy and complacent and raise up the poor, rejected and marginalized.

If these words were anywhere else, some would label them socialistic or dangerously revolutionary. The Bible simply calls this justice – God’s preferential option for the downtrodden – the anawim – the landless, dependent ‘humble poor’ who have no human support and cry out to the Lord for help. It is a theme that runs through the whole Bible, particularly the Psalms. Mary’s own words echo very closely those of another pregnant mother filled with hopes for a fairer world: Hannah, who in a similar era of oppression and corruption cries out to God who ‘raises the poor from the dust and lifts the needy from the ash heap.’[1]

Mary’s son would continue the theme, applying Isaiah’s words to himself: proclaiming good news to the poor, setting the oppressed free and declaring the year of Jubilee.[2] Jesus would promise God’s blessing on the anawim – the humble poor – declaring that God’s Kingdom would be theirs, but that the rich, comfortable and well-fed should beware.[3]

So how does Mary’s song speak to us today, in an era of economic and environmental trauma, where the poor and the planet have no voice of their own?

I’ve been researching teenage environmental attitudes today, and it makes disturbing reading. A major 30 year overview of American adolescent environmental beliefs and behaviours concluded, ‘We found a precipitous decline in high school seniors’ reports of conservation behaviors across the three decades.’[4] A survey of Australian teenagers suggested, ‘Generally students from both rural and urban regions were quite concerned, yet pessimistic, about environmental issues.’[5] When A Rocha UK joined with several other organizations for a national ‘Hope for the Planet’ tour in 2008–9 we found exactly the same. We encountered a high level of knowledge and understanding about Climate Change and its consequences, but deep cynicism about politicians, business-leaders, parents… and churches. The attitude could be summarized as, ‘Why should I bother, when I can’t change anything, and those with the power are too caught up in the system?’

Of course teenagers, just like their parents, can be complacent, lazy and hedonistic. Any of us can get sucked into the consumer-materialist bubble, where the lukewarm slacktivism of e-petitions and ‘liking’ others’ posts salves our conscience but doesn’t exactly change the world. But it worries me greatly that the passion of Mary’s teenage song seems – with rare and wonderful exceptions – to be missing today. I don’t have all the answers. Please help me out with your suggestions. But it seems to me that the heart of it includes:

And all of that brings us to Christmas – God’s gift to change the world. Hope for the hopeless, born in weakness; light in the darkness, flickering and fragile but real and visible; not theories and ideas but Immanuel – God with us – a transforming relationship with one who gives freedom to captives and restores the broken-hearted.

[1] 1 Samuel 2:8
[2] Luke 4:18-19, based on Isaiah 61:1–2, 58:6
[3] Luke 6:20–26
[4] Wray-Lake, L., Flanagan, C. A. and Osgood D. W. (2010). ‘Examining Trends in Adolescent Environmental Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behaviors Across Three Decades’. Environmental Behaviour 42:1, 61–85.
[5] Worsley A., Skrzypiec G. (1998). ‘Environmental Attitudes of Senior Secondary School Students in South Australia’. Global Environmental Change 8:3, 209–225.

About Dave Bookless

Dave has worked with A Rocha since 1997, first as an International Trustee, then from 2001 with A Rocha UK as co-founder (with his wife Anne), National Director, and then Director for Theology, Churches & Sustainable Communities. He joined the A Rocha International team in September 2011. His role as Advisor for Theology and Churches includes providing advice and resources for ARI’s Trustees, Team and national A Rocha organisations, and coordinating liaison with international theological and mission networks and organisations. He is also studying for a part-time PhD at Cambridge University on biblical theology and biodiversity conservation.

View all posts by Dave Bookless

2 responses to “Mary – Teenage revolutionary”

  1. mabbsonsea says:

    Thank you for raising this. I suspect young people have learned what they’ve been taught by my generation (40-50s – i.e. their parents) – themselves/ourselves products of these last 30+ years of rampant consumerism. Over that period, the same consumerism has infected the church in the rise of flashy, high-spending churches with the latest songs, the latest equipment etc. I think the challenge to the church, arising from the apathy you write about, is to search for a simpler & more authentic way of being that puts compassion for the poor (people, plants, animals, planet) at its core. But it’s hard swimming against a very powerful flow. All power to A Rocha’s elbow in helping us with the search!

    • Dave Bookless says:

      Thanks Alex! I like what you’re writing on this @ http://mabbsonsea.wordpress.com. Another of the ingredients is that we can’t do this on our own. It requires intentional community-living, building together what we can’t do alone, and being accountable to each other.

Leave a Reply